True Crime: A mystery in two parts

Part One: The evidence

the crime.jpg

Gory, I know. The astute viewer may note toothmarks along the spindle’s shaft. The manner in which the singles was torn from the spindle and killed may also provide a clue as to the culprit. (A chilling look into the criminal’s cold, cold heart.)

50 Comments on “True Crime: A mystery in two parts

  1. I thought only dogs stole yarn at your house! The poor yarn and spindle…the carnage!
    Posted by: Jaimi

  2. I thought only dogs stole yarn at your house! The poor yarn and spindle…the carnage!
    Posted by: Jaimi

  3. Don’t have to be a psychic detective to know that cat had a wonderful time killing that spindle.
    Posted by: Lee

  4. Awww…. I have some chewed needles from dogs and cats… I never leave anything out anymore. I’m a little scared to see what happens with the yarn and the loom as I take up weaving. I don’t know anything about spinning. I hope it’s all salvagable.
    Posted by: ellie

  5. Note to self: do not accept any packages from Cari this week, especially if the package is mewing.
    Posted by: Iris

  6. Well. Now that shaft will have good traction for the thigh-launch.

    🙂
    Posted by: claudia

  7. I had assumed a dog did it. Mostly because one of mine tried to do the same thing to mine. AS I was spinning!
    Posted by: no-blog-rachel

  8. Don’t have to be a psychic detective to know that cat had a wonderful time killing that spindle.
    Posted by: Lee

  9. Awww…. I have some chewed needles from dogs and cats… I never leave anything out anymore. I’m a little scared to see what happens with the yarn and the loom as I take up weaving. I don’t know anything about spinning. I hope it’s all salvagable.
    Posted by: ellie

  10. Note to self: do not accept any packages from Cari this week, especially if the package is mewing.
    Posted by: Iris

  11. Well. Now that shaft will have good traction for the thigh-launch.

    🙂
    Posted by: claudia

  12. I had assumed a dog did it. Mostly because one of mine tried to do the same thing to mine. AS I was spinning!
    Posted by: no-blog-rachel

  13. Ouch! That’s painful to view. I don’t think it’s completely dead. I believe it can be saved. Saving the singles may not be possible, but I know that with a bit of rehab, the spindle will again be well.
    Posted by: Sarah

  14. Let’s not be too hasty here. Oscar may be getting a bad rap.

    Could it be that Billy snapped behind the pressure of new fatherhood?
    Posted by: Catherine

  15. Uh oh! I’m betting it was a puppy in this case. The teeth marks look to big to me. But then, it is still in one piece. Most dogs would have snaped the spindle to pieces. Interesting…
    Posted by: Whitney

  16. You kind of can’t blame a guy for mistaking something that rolls and has yarn wrapped around it for a cat toy. Cats can be so ridiculous: my friend Ann’s kitty chews big, honking holes out of woolen garments. Needless to say, Ann’s not knitting with the good stuff these days.
    Posted by: regina

  17. Ouch! That’s painful to view. I don’t think it’s completely dead. I believe it can be saved. Saving the singles may not be possible, but I know that with a bit of rehab, the spindle will again be well.
    Posted by: Sarah

  18. Let’s not be too hasty here. Oscar may be getting a bad rap.

    Could it be that Billy snapped behind the pressure of new fatherhood?
    Posted by: Catherine

  19. Uh oh! I’m betting it was a puppy in this case. The teeth marks look to big to me. But then, it is still in one piece. Most dogs would have snaped the spindle to pieces. Interesting…
    Posted by: Whitney

  20. You kind of can’t blame a guy for mistaking something that rolls and has yarn wrapped around it for a cat toy. Cats can be so ridiculous: my friend Ann’s kitty chews big, honking holes out of woolen garments. Needless to say, Ann’s not knitting with the good stuff these days.
    Posted by: regina

  21. The really disturbing thing about this crime scene is how *little* carnage there is. The singles were neatly, almost surgically separated from the shaft. But the fiber hasn’t been pulled apart or mangled the way you’d expect someone in a rage would.

    The shaft of the spindle is marked, but not seriously damaged. That spindle could have gotten away if it hadn’t been physically restrained.

    This criminal wasn’t motivated by anger or desperation or even profit. The criminal did this for . . . enjoyment. *Shudder*
    Posted by: David

  22. Ooohhhh…Take it away! Take it away! Bones & guts make me queasy….I’ll send you some chalk to outline the “body” ooooooo
    Posted by: Carol

  23. dogs steal yarn…becomes…cat attacks spindles.

    (the yarn singles are beautiful, and seem to have withstood the attack. I think that is an excellent yarn quality.)

    there is more (!) evidence to this crime?
    Posted by: Kristen

  24. I’m starting to see the logic in my husband’s no-animals-in-the-house rule now – but, since my three-year-old can do the same amount of damage, I’m wondering if we should lump him in with the cats and dogs on this issue.
    Posted by: Krista

  25. The really disturbing thing about this crime scene is how *little* carnage there is. The singles were neatly, almost surgically separated from the shaft. But the fiber hasn’t been pulled apart or mangled the way you’d expect someone in a rage would.

    The shaft of the spindle is marked, but not seriously damaged. That spindle could have gotten away if it hadn’t been physically restrained.

    This criminal wasn’t motivated by anger or desperation or even profit. The criminal did this for . . . enjoyment. *Shudder*
    Posted by: David

  26. Ooohhhh…Take it away! Take it away! Bones & guts make me queasy….I’ll send you some chalk to outline the “body” ooooooo
    Posted by: Carol

  27. dogs steal yarn…becomes…cat attacks spindles.

    (the yarn singles are beautiful, and seem to have withstood the attack. I think that is an excellent yarn quality.)

    there is more (!) evidence to this crime?
    Posted by: Kristen

  28. I’m starting to see the logic in my husband’s no-animals-in-the-house rule now – but, since my three-year-old can do the same amount of damage, I’m wondering if we should lump him in with the cats and dogs on this issue.
    Posted by: Krista

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*